All That Chat - re: NEW

re: NEW
Posted by: ryhog 11:30 pm EDT 10/14/24
In reply to: re: NEW - oddone 10:48 am EDT 10/14/24

My recollection, which may be wrong, is that the category is only revisited on application of someone. Personally, I don't think it meets the definition of a revival, because it hasn't been done enough, but again, I may be wrong.
reply

Previous:	re: NEW - oddone 10:48 am EDT 10/14/24
Next:	re: NEW/Revival - NewtonUK 06:42 am EDT 10/15/24
Thread:	re: NEW/Revival - NewtonUK 06:42 am EDT 10/15/24 (14) Fortune's Fool - Chazwaza 05:47 pm EDT 10/16/24 re: NEW/Revival - ryhog 07:42 pm EDT 10/15/24 (12) re: NEW/Revival - Broadwaywannabe 06:48 am EDT 10/16/24 (11) re: NEW/Revival - ryhog 07:01 pm EDT 10/16/24 (4) re: NEW/Revival - AlanScott 07:33 pm EDT 10/16/24 (3) re: NEW/Revival - ryhog 10:21 pm EDT 10/16/24 (2) re: NEW/Revival - AlanScott 03:32 pm EDT 10/17/24 (1) re: NEW/Revival - ryhog 06:04 pm EDT 10/17/24 go figure - sc2 07:28 am EDT 10/16/24 (5) R+H's Cinderella - Chazwaza 08:19 pm EDT 10/16/24 (4) lovely night was not written for The brandy version - sc2 08:50 pm EDT 10/16/24 (3) re: lovely night was not written for The brandy version - Chazwaza 09:09 pm EDT 10/16/24 (2) the 1958 London cash recording is wonderful - sc2 09:25 pm EDT 10/16/24 (1) re: the 1958 London cash recording is wonderful - sc2 06:03 pm EDT 10/17/24

Time to render: 0.103878 seconds.