All That Chat - Why hasn't there been a revival of CITY OF ANGELS?

ATC MAIN NEW THREAD NEWEST POSTS FLAT MODE SHOPPIN' ON THE BOARDS

Why hasn't there been a revival of CITY OF ANGELS?
Posted by: CallMeRusty 04:21 pm EST 02/03/25

It's such a fun musical with a wonderful score and clever lyrics. Surely there must be a reason it hasn't been revived -- any guesses?
reply

Previous:	Audience votes as seven playwrights compete for a $500 prize - Official_Press_Release 04:29 pm EST 02/03/25
Next:	re: CITY OF ANGELS needs Encores Production - FinalPerformance 02:27 pm EST 02/04/25
Thread:	re: CITY OF ANGELS needs Encores Production - FinalPerformance 02:27 pm EST 02/04/25 (4) I think COA is top on the Encores list, and they're waiting for stars would would make a Bway production viable if it transferred - Chazwaza 08:45 pm EST 02/04/25 (1) re: I think COA is top on the Encores list, and they're waiting for stars would would make a Bway production viable if it transferred - Chromolume 09:26 pm EST 02/04/25 re: CITY OF ANGELS needs Encores Production - bicoastal 03:30 pm EST 02/04/25 (1) re: CITY OF ANGELS needs Encores Production - FinalPerformance 04:34 pm EST 02/04/25 re: Why hasn't there been a revival of CITY OF ANGELS? - NiceSkeleton 01:54 pm EST 02/04/25 (1) what would make the rights impossible to get? - Chazwaza 08:47 pm EST 02/04/25 re: Calling Encores! - Zelgo 11:20 am EST 02/04/25 (1) re: Calling Encores! - FrenchDip 02:54 pm EST 02/04/25 re: Why hasn't there been a revival of CITY OF ANGELS? - Chromolume 08:30 pm EST 02/03/25 (2) re: Why hasn't there been a revival of CITY OF ANGELS? - JereNYC 08:09 am EST 02/04/25 (1) re: Why hasn't there been a revival of CITY OF ANGELS? - Chromolume 07:36 pm EST 02/04/25 because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chazwaza 06:25 pm EST 02/03/25 (19) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - BroadwayTonyJ 07:00 pm EST 02/03/25 (18) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - EvFoDr 02:42 pm EST 02/04/25 (4) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chromolume 07:46 pm EST 02/04/25 (3) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chazwaza 08:43 pm EST 02/04/25 (2) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chromolume 09:03 pm EST 02/04/25 (1) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chazwaza 03:42 am EST 02/05/25 re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - RoadGypsy2010 09:40 pm EST 02/03/25 (12) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Ann 06:55 am EST 02/04/25 (5) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - RoadGypsy2010 03:34 pm EST 02/04/25 (2) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - TheOtherOne 10:31 pm EST 02/04/25 re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - sf 05:06 pm EST 02/04/25 re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - WaymanWong 02:34 pm EST 02/04/25 (1) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chromolume 10:32 pm EST 02/04/25 re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - champagnesalesman 12:19 am EST 02/04/25 (5) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - sf 08:35 am EST 02/04/25 (4) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - MistressAndy 10:21 am EST 02/04/25 (3) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chromolume 10:44 pm EST 02/04/25 re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - sf 11:26 am EST 02/04/25 (1) re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - champagnesalesman 11:53 am EST 02/04/25

Time to render: 0.477087 seconds.