Menu
Home page
About/Contact
All that chat
Atc shoppin'
On the boards
Broadway reviews
Off Broadway reviews
Regional reviews
» Albuquerque/Santa Fe
» Boston
» Chicago
» Cincinnati
» Connecticut and the Berkshires
» Florida - Southern
» Florida - West Coast
» Greater New York State
» Las Vegas
» Los Angeles
» Minneapolis/St. Paul
» New Jersey
» Other Regions
» Palm Springs / Coachella Valley
» Philadelphia
» Phoenix
» Raleigh/Durham
» San Diego
» San Francisco/North Bay
» San Jose/Silicon Valley
» Seattle
» St. Louis
» Washington, D.C.
» Wisconsin, SE
Sound advice cd reviews
Sound advice new/upcoming list
Tony Awards
What's new on the rialto?
Search All That Chat
LOGIN /
REGISTER
Share:
LOGIN /
REGISTER
ATC MAIN
NEW THREAD
NEWEST POSTS
FLAT MODE
SHOPPIN'
ON THE BOARDS
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
Posted by:
BroadwayTonyJ
07:00 pm EST 02/03/25
In reply to:
because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chazwaza
06:25 pm EST 02/03/25
I think the trio of Groff, Radcliffe, and Mendez in
City of Angels
would work both artistically and at the box office, assuming that Radcliffe can handle Stine's vocals.
Mendez would knock "You Can Always Count on Me" out of the park.
reply
Previous:
because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chazwaza
06:25 pm EST 02/03/25
Next:
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
EvFoDr
02:42 pm EST 02/04/25
Thread:
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
EvFoDr
02:42 pm EST 02/04/25
(4)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chromolume
07:46 pm EST 02/04/25
(3)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chazwaza
08:43 pm EST 02/04/25
(2)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chromolume
09:03 pm EST 02/04/25
(1)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chazwaza
03:42 am EST 02/05/25
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
RoadGypsy2010
09:40 pm EST 02/03/25
(12)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Ann
06:55 am EST 02/04/25
(5)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
RoadGypsy2010
03:34 pm EST 02/04/25
(2)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
TheOtherOne
10:31 pm EST 02/04/25
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
sf
05:06 pm EST 02/04/25
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
WaymanWong
02:34 pm EST 02/04/25
(1)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chromolume
10:32 pm EST 02/04/25
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
champagnesalesman
12:19 am EST 02/04/25
(5)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
sf
08:35 am EST 02/04/25
(4)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
MistressAndy
10:21 am EST 02/04/25
(3)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
Chromolume
10:44 pm EST 02/04/25
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
sf
11:26 am EST 02/04/25
(1)
re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
-
champagnesalesman
11:53 am EST 02/04/25
Time to render: 0.136833 seconds.