| re: I wonder how much changed from London. | |
| Posted by: bway1430 03:11 am EST 12/01/24 | |
| In reply to: I wonder how much changed from London. - dramedy 09:36 pm EST 11/30/24 | |
|
|
|
| Much of the show was actually improved for Broadway. It had a tighter framework (certainly a much better, cleaner ending). They cut two songs from the second act of the London production that needed to go and clarified the story a bit more. Sadly, a fair amount of clunky dialogue remains in the opening scenes establishing Jim and Tammy's relationship and I wish they could have fixed that. But despite any changes, I don't even know if great reviews would have saved this show. The advance was terrible and hardly any seats were sold to give a sign that this was a show people wanted to see. I think the marketing was godawful and putting it in The Palace was a massive, costly mistake. I find its failure heartbreaking as there was a lot to like in it and Katie Brayben's performance was thrilling. I hope they at least record it once it closes - the score and Katie's performance are well worth preserving (in my opinion). |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | I wonder how much changed from London. - dramedy 09:36 pm EST 11/30/24 |
| Next: | re: I wonder how much changed from London. - Live_From_London 08:03 pm EST 12/01/24 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.048871 seconds.