re: PLATT NOT GLATT
Last Edit: Chromolume 05:43 pm EDT 06/06/24
Posted by: Chromolume 05:42 pm EDT 06/06/24
In reply to: re: PLATT NOT GLATT - WaymanWong 05:31 pm EDT 06/06/24

Just because the show doesn't WANT reviews (or isn't ready for them), critics don't have to abide just because they didn't get a comp. They could buy a ticket and report on it anyway, as a matter of newsworthiness. And sometimes critics have done that: ''Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark,'' anyone?

SpiderMAN, or SpiderWOMAN? Definitely the latter. I can't keep the SpiderMAN story straight anymore - all I remember is that previews went on for f-ing ever. :-)
reply

Previous: SARAVA (1979) + MERLIN (1983) were reviewed with paid-for tkts. nmi - icecadet 02:14 pm EDT 06/07/24
Next: re: PLATT NOT GLATT - jgerard 05:41 pm EDT 06/06/24
Thread:


    Time to render: 0.010377 seconds.