re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit
Posted by: writerkev 01:38 pm EST 02/05/25
In reply to: re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chazwaza 11:44 am EST 02/05/25

Well, he seems to be pretty “castable” in roles you don’t think he’s right for. In fact, he won a Tony Award for one of them. So, yeah, maybe this discussion of notes is pointless, as you suggest.

When is an actor’s terrible performance the fault of the actor? Why do you place all the blame on the director? How do we ever praise an actor for a good performance if all the blame for a bad performance goes to the director? I don’t buy it. He was hopeless in the role. Sure, maybe the director did him no favors, but he’s the one who got up there and did it like that. Totally agree with you about the talk of his having been snubbed for a Tony nomination. That mystified me.
reply

Previous: re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - Chromolume 03:32 pm EST 02/05/25
Next: re: because Hugh Jackman and/or Jake Gyllenhaal won't commit - RoadGypsy2010 09:40 pm EST 02/03/25
Thread:


    Time to render: 0.015335 seconds.