| re: The "classic" Warner Bros. film? | |
| Posted by: Ann 08:30 am EST 01/28/25 | |
| In reply to: re: The "classic" Warner Bros. film? - Chromolume 10:55 pm EST 01/27/25 | |
|
|
|
| Some of my thoughts on why it's not talked about much here (all my opinion): * it's not a revival of a classic * there's nothing controversial about it (in particular, nothing that you can know/discuss without seeing it, like Tammy Faye), which gets the most attention here. The subthread about whether or not Jeremy Jordan is a TV star has gotten more discussion than anything else in the musical * most people here no longer (or never did) see everything, and again, not much about it to discuss if you haven't seen it * of the people here who still see a lot, but not everything, this show/cast doesn't appeal (at least one person here falls into that category) - especially at the elevated prices of today. Even before it opened, the anticipation was at about the "meh" level. Even though other people (I'm guessing a lot of young people) are buying tickets. We are a small, older group. * there have been so many adaptations of the novel, how they adapted may not be of as much interest Maybe after a second cup of coffee, I'll have more - and also some examples of this happening before here. |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: The "classic" Warner Bros. film? - KingSpeed 08:22 pm EST 01/29/25 |
| Next: | So the rumor that queen of versailles - dramedy 05:25 pm EST 01/27/25 |
| Thread: | |
Time to render: 0.022023 seconds.