re: Why isn't Andrea McArdle a bigger star?
Posted by: Likeitlots 12:57 pm EST 01/07/25
In reply to: re: Why isn't Andrea McArdle a bigger star? - lordofspeech 12:45 pm EST 01/07/25

What an odd and icky comment. How many Broadway stars are, in terms of looks, in the same league as Nicole Kidman? Since when does one have to be a "knockout" to be a Broadway star? I am not going to justify this with a list of all the stars who are not conventionally great beauties,but very few are. And the "gals" on Desperate Housewives? That's your sexist measure? A show from 20 years ago? Ew.

McArdle is not a bigger star, in my estimation, because while she possesses a fantastic instrument and uses it very well, she is a bit dead behind the eyes. She is a great belter but not a great interpreter.
reply

Previous: re: Why isn't Andrea McArdle a bigger star? - lordofspeech 12:45 pm EST 01/07/25
Next: re: Why isn't Andrea McArdle a bigger star? - Chromolume 12:22 pm EST 01/07/25
Thread:


    Time to render: 0.047226 seconds.