| the bank? ITW ran for 6 months... and was not good because of the direction | |
| Posted by: Chazwaza 09:22 pm EDT 09/17/24 | |
| In reply to: re: I guess no one at LCT saw “Oliver” or “Hercules” … - Singapore/Fling 10:22 pm EDT 09/11/24 | |
|
|
|
| Not exactly an enormous hit. It FELT like one but was it? It was also FINE at best... I'd go as far as to say it was not even very good from a directorial or production standpoint, if it even had one. And at times it was quite misdirected and poorly staged, which for a semi-staged bare-bones "production"/concert, is a pretty bad thing to be weak at. That revival was worthwhile specifically for the cast(s)... and it's multiple iterations of the cast. And I say that having not even loved many of the performances I saw (Joshua Henry I'm looking at you, sir). I wouldn't care how long it ran if I thought it was great or even artful or even thoughtful... it was FINE. It *mostly* didn't mess it up or get in the way of the material (except the GLARING issue of the staging of "It Takes Two" where the direction literally got in the way of the material)... but it is not an example of a brilliant director by any stretch. A worthwhile *producer* more accurately, I'd say. (that is when she's not allowing/commissioning people to rewrite and tear apart other peoples shows under the mission of celebrating underappreciated treasures) |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: I guess no one at LCT saw “Oliver” or “Hercules” … - Singapore/Fling 10:22 pm EDT 09/11/24 |
| Next: | re: I guess no one at LCT saw “Oliver” or “Hercules” … - Chromolume 11:39 pm EDT 09/11/24 |
| Thread: | |
Time to render: 0.011171 seconds.