| re: Patrick Stewart in a Christmas carol. |
| Posted by: AlanScott 10:41 pm EDT 09/05/24 |
| In reply to: re: Patrick Stewart in a Christmas carol. - dramedy 07:12 pm EDT 09/05/24 |
|
I forgot about the New Amsterdam. I understand why you say that a few plays in the 1930s don't count, but I don't think I agree. (Actually, there were a lot of plays performed over the course of its history as a theatre, although many of them were for very short runs as part of repertories of companies that played brief seasons there.) I don't think I agree because the theatre as it is now is pretty similar to what it it was in the 1930s and earlier. Wasn't the renovation to restore it to what it had been like? I think you could make a case that the Lunt-Fontanne is basically a different theatre than the Globe because the renovation was an extreme one, but the New Amsterdam is essentially the same New Amsterdam.
But perhaps you mean something different, perhaps just that it was not used for theatre for a long time (and wasn't used for anything at all for a long time). |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Patrick Stewart in a Christmas carol. - dramedy 07:12 pm EDT 09/05/24 |
| Next: |
BIRDLAND presents the return of Golden Globe winner AMANDA McBROOM - celebrating her new holiday album "WINTERSONG" - 9/23 - Official_Press_Release 04:40 pm EDT 09/04/24 |
| Thread: |
|
